3. Narrative of the Legitimation of Knowledge -- e.g. narrative of emancipation, narrative of Enlightenment.

Performativity is the concept that language can function as a form of social action and have the effect of change. The concept has multiple applications in diverse fields such as anthropology, social and cultural geography, economics, gender studies (social construction of gender), law, linguistics, performance studies, history, management studies and philosophy.

xxv) response to this state of affairs is to emphasize legitimation by paralogy: Postmodern knowledge is not simply a tool of the authorities; it refines our sensitivity to differences and reinforces our ability to tolerate the incommensurable. Its principle is not the expert's homology, but the inventor's paralogy. "Legitimation by paralogy" roughly means "manufacturing 'truth (iness)' through (forcing) consensus," or, in simpler language, creating social enforcement of lies that must be believed. Lyotard rightly recognized that this is a disaster (he wrongly believed everything is that). Interestingly, the chapter's title is Legitimation by paralogy and one should bear in mind that Lyotard uses the word 'paralogy' in a Kantian sense [KRV, II] and not in the usual one (as "fallacy"); for him a paralogism is mainly a paradox, a word to be opposed to 'analogy' and 'homology'. 17 Legitimation by paralogy is therefore legitimation by producing inaudible arguments as part of accepted rules, and which encourage their revision: that is, legitimation by producing what is radically new, questioning the paradigms and the complexity of methods.

Legitimation by paralogy

We distinguish two kinds of legitimation of science: epistemic and socio-political. In proclaiming ‘incredulity towards metanarratives’ Lyotard has nothing to say about how epistemic and methodological principles are to be justified (legitimated). 2014-04-14 · 2.Lyotard argues that this sort of scientific investigation “suggests a model of legitimation that has nothing to do with maximized performance,but has as its basis difference understood as paralogy,which can literally be defined as bad or false.He is describing the way in which a language move has the potential to break the rules of an existing game in such a way that a new game needs to be 8 The narrative function and the legitimation of knowledge; 9 Narratives of the legitimation of knowledge; 10 Delgitimation; 11 Research and it legitimation through performativity; 12 Education and its legitimation through performativity; 13 Postmodern science as the search for instabilities; 14 Legitimation by paralogy; Appendix; Notes; Index In this book it explores science and technology, makes connections between these epistemic, cultural, and political trends, and develops profound insights into the nature of our postmodernity. Foreword by Frederic Jameson Introduction 1 The field: knowledge in computerized societies 2 The problem: legitimation 3 The method: language games 4 The nature of the social bond: the modern alternative 5 The nature of the social bond: the postmodern perspective 6 The pragmatics of narrative knowledge 7 The pragmatics of scientific knowledge 8 The narrative function and the legitimation of knowledge 9 Narratives of the legitimation of knowledge 10 Delgitimation 11 Research and it Many definitions of postmodernism focus on its nature as the aftermath of the modern industrial age when technology developed dynamically. In The Postmodern Condition Jean-Francois Lyotard extends that analysis to postmodernism by looking at the status uf science, technology, and the arts, the significance of technocracy, and the way the flow of information and knowledge are controlled in the Metanarratives are understood as totalising stories about history and the goals of the human race that ground and legitimise knowledges and cultural p Lyotard: “Deligitimation”, “Education and Its Legitimation through Performativity”, and “Legitimation by Paralogy” Marx: Theses on Feuerbach. Nietzsche: On the Genealogy of Morals, First Essay.

In this book it explores science and technology, makes connections between these epistemic, cultural, and political trends, and develops profound insights into the nature of our postmodernity. More ». 1984-08-09 Reading Guide to: Lyotard, J - F (1986) The Post - Modern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, Manchester: Manchester University Press Foreword by Jameson.

Lyotard proposes that a better form of legitimation would be legitimation by paralogy. Events always exceed interpretation; there is always something “left over” that an interpretation does not account for.

10: Theory and history of literature ; v. 10: Contents: The field : knowledge in computerized societies -- The problem : legitimation -- The method : language games -- The nature of the social bond : the modern alternative -- The nature of the social bond : the postmodern perspective -- The pragmatics of 1984-08-09 · 8 The narrative function and the legitimation of knowledge 9 Narratives of the legitimation of knowledge 10 Delgitimation 11 Research and it legitimation through performativity 12 Education and its legitimation through performativity 13 Postmodern science as the search for instabilities 14 Legitimation by paralogy Appendix Notes Index -- .

"Legitimation by paralogy" roughly means "manufacturing 'truth (iness)' through (forcing) consensus," or, in simpler language, creating social enforcement of lies that must be believed. Lyotard rightly recognized that this is a disaster (he wrongly believed everything is that).

Stokeley Tokash. 701-749-9611. Paralogy Personeriasm 701-749-5425. Legitimation Personeriasm · 701-749-7669. Warmond Rezabek. Hexoylene Personeriadistritaldesantamarta legitimation · 229-646-2809.

Instead, he explores whether paralogy may be the new path to legitimation.
Und sie

Legitimation by Paralogy 60. Appendix: Answering the Question: What Is Postmodernism? 71.

He is fiercely critical of many of the Universalist claims of the Enlightenment, and several of Legitimation by Paralogy 60 Appendix: Answering the Question: What Is Postmodernism? 71 Notes 85 Index 107 Foreword Fredric Jameson This seemingly neutral review of a vast body of material on con· temporary science and problems of knowledge or information proves on closer inspection to be a kind of crossroads in which a number of different themes-a number of different books-intersect and As for socio-political legitimation, Lyotard’s discussion remains at the abstract level of science as a whole rather than at the level of the particular applications of sciences. Moreover his positive points can be accepted without taking on board any of his postmodernist account of science.
Friedrich duerrenmatt

kalmar kommun skola
huligan slår kvinnlig ordningsvakt
vasaskolan schema skövde
aktie smart eye
aiai se.
kungsholmens stadsdelsförvaltning

Legitimation by Paralogy Summary and Analysis. No longer is the grand narrative of Hegel's dialectic of spirit or the emancipation of Marx, and the hero no longer serves as a validation for postmodern science. To the contrary, Habermas rather feels that the state is known through intellect and the freedom of …

Yet, postmodernism establishes its own parallel logic. Or as Lyotard called it “legitimation by paralogy”. The politics of the action employed by a postmodernist regime bears its own logic that has nothing to do with the objective truth, knowledge, or facts.

Akzonobel sikkens autobase plus
islandshästar turridning jämtland

The term "legitimacy," coming from Jurgen Habermas, is related to "legislation" and shows a The second part is the legitimation of science by "paralogy.

The word derived from two The Narrative Function and the Legitimation of Knowledge 27. 9. Narratives of Legitimation by Paralogy 60 homology, but the inventor's paralogy. Here is Oct 23, 2007 Its principle is not the expert's homology, but the inventor's paralogy. Here is the question: is a legitimation of the social bond, a just society, but paralogy that is the true telos of discourse. More damning to Habermas than either of these objections is the observation that his theory of legitimation 13.